Some of the upper middle class reactions to the CWG crisis has been weird and/or stupid- varies from person to person. Why do I think so?
1. Reaction to corruption: We all do know that corruption is something that exists & we live with it. Even in stuff as critical as defense aircraft deals, there exists corruption & sub-standard deals ! Any reason the same shouldnt be there in something as non-essential or non-critical as a CWG? There's nothing to crib about in money having been siphoned out using these games as a front. It is part of the deal for an economy like ours
2. Delays/last mile execution hitches: Again, in doing something this large scale, there will be hitches. We will have more than a developed country would have. It works that way coz it is that way. We cant expect an India to execute this kind of infra like say a USA. Not yet anyways...Blowing up every small detail on national media is just plain vanilla stupid
3. Context: Lastly, the CWG is a bygone concept. If these were the Olympics or even say something like a WC Hockey, the powers-that-be would have gotten involved earlier and ensured smoother execution. Our media doesnt have much else to report now and with every news of a snake or filth capturing national middle-class attention, they are loving increased TRPs. Some good journos in the HT have pointed how the Manchester & Melbourne editions had athletes staying in hostels ! even 8 a room..
And we dont need to make this into a "Indian image" or "India cant execute" kind of a thing. Its not really the "failure" of a nation if there are issues. Its more like a failure of that management team (whatever be the reasons, ranging from corruption to bureaucracy to inefficiency).
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
Interesting blog post
I have appended some blogs from VCs that I read often on the right side of this blogspot (look to the right). An interesting post today on www.bothsidesofthetable.com...Give it a read.. ..A bit of a "gyaan" piece, but still nice..
The value of the network
It would be interesting to discover the value of the "network" in a startup. More than value, the question is - what kind of network helps. & I am discovering some stuff here. Lemme tell what kind of a network would help a wannabe "starter":
1. People with a network of very small designers, CAs, lawyers, company secretaries etc
2. Those with knowledge of pricing done by such smaller agencies
3. Those with the intent / desire to spend an hour a week on the idea at hand
& plus if you are not from a tech background, someone with understanding of tech pricing & products. Now, very less of the network you have if you are a typical MBA esp with banking/fin serv experience would be of this type.
Its not a crib session but really a direction on the kind of network one must try & build before making a decision to start something. I actually did build the odd contact in this direction like for e.g. a secretarial firm who I now use for incorporation etc. But I do realise that I could have done much much more in this direction as a preparation before starting out.
Trying now to tackle atleast the problem of the lack of cross functional expertise by "thinking" of bringing in such guys as advisors to the venture. Will see if & how that works out..
1. People with a network of very small designers, CAs, lawyers, company secretaries etc
2. Those with knowledge of pricing done by such smaller agencies
3. Those with the intent / desire to spend an hour a week on the idea at hand
& plus if you are not from a tech background, someone with understanding of tech pricing & products. Now, very less of the network you have if you are a typical MBA esp with banking/fin serv experience would be of this type.
Its not a crib session but really a direction on the kind of network one must try & build before making a decision to start something. I actually did build the odd contact in this direction like for e.g. a secretarial firm who I now use for incorporation etc. But I do realise that I could have done much much more in this direction as a preparation before starting out.
Trying now to tackle atleast the problem of the lack of cross functional expertise by "thinking" of bringing in such guys as advisors to the venture. Will see if & how that works out..
Sunday, July 18, 2010
MVP & more..
Lots of theory on MVP (Minimum Viable Product) & the Lean Startup in the US of A. Interesting theories around pivoting - which is the process of a startup creating a prototype and then adapting based on market responses.
But much of them focusing on tech/web startups. Not so many on the normal offline-online kind of combination which prevails in our parts of the world.
In any event, the theorized versions of the MVP are quite intriguing. There are several key questions around this concept of MVP. But I am experiencing the below 2 as most critical:
1. Determining how much is the minimum from a product design perspective
2. Determining the pricing
Now, Q No.1 is well answered and the answer is kinda common whether tech or non-tech. It should largely be the intersection set of what the customer wants and how much you can deliver within your proposed outlay (whether self funded bootstrapped or investor funded) & available talent.
Q No. 2 though is radically different for tech. Esp the new age ones. Many of the iconic sites like FB, twitter & the less iconic ones like simple photo sharing ones etc have the liberty to launch "limited period free" products (being subscription businesses). Plus they have the ability to launch free & paid-premium services.
However, this is much more complex in a non e-business- the issues being:
1. Products are typically one shot consumption products. You gotta sell the product on Day 1
2. If you dont price at all , measuring test success is difficult
3. In case you price the product (& if there are certain product issues or you substantially change the product later), there may be customer issues
Solutions ?
1. Handling the initial customers very closely via email etc & promising to provide them any updates on the site in the next 12 months for free? (very tedious process-wise.............)
2. Maybe pricing at ZERO for say first 25 customers but gauging demand from web hits, requests from more customers, engagement of those who hav bought for zero etc
3. Charging a minimal cost & then combining it with No.2 above?
Interesting, nevertheless....
But much of them focusing on tech/web startups. Not so many on the normal offline-online kind of combination which prevails in our parts of the world.
In any event, the theorized versions of the MVP are quite intriguing. There are several key questions around this concept of MVP. But I am experiencing the below 2 as most critical:
1. Determining how much is the minimum from a product design perspective
2. Determining the pricing
Now, Q No.1 is well answered and the answer is kinda common whether tech or non-tech. It should largely be the intersection set of what the customer wants and how much you can deliver within your proposed outlay (whether self funded bootstrapped or investor funded) & available talent.
Q No. 2 though is radically different for tech. Esp the new age ones. Many of the iconic sites like FB, twitter & the less iconic ones like simple photo sharing ones etc have the liberty to launch "limited period free" products (being subscription businesses). Plus they have the ability to launch free & paid-premium services.
However, this is much more complex in a non e-business- the issues being:
1. Products are typically one shot consumption products. You gotta sell the product on Day 1
2. If you dont price at all , measuring test success is difficult
3. In case you price the product (& if there are certain product issues or you substantially change the product later), there may be customer issues
Solutions ?
1. Handling the initial customers very closely via email etc & promising to provide them any updates on the site in the next 12 months for free? (very tedious process-wise.............)
2. Maybe pricing at ZERO for say first 25 customers but gauging demand from web hits, requests from more customers, engagement of those who hav bought for zero etc
3. Charging a minimal cost & then combining it with No.2 above?
Interesting, nevertheless....
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Welcome to BetterLesson
Welcome to BetterLesson: "Receive real recognition for high-quality lessons"
And another one...Interesting again..
University of the People – The world’s first tuition free online university
University of the People – The world’s first tuition free online university
Very interesting concept...free education using the web.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
The Perils of...
This is the season for me defining perils ! Thats what I am confronting ever so often. Possibly in some time, I may have recommendations, but right now, I am only defining perils.
One of the dangers of having worked in a pure corporate fin services background is that you "actually do" very less. Time is spent largely on analysis (less) and presenting it in various formats (more). You do get a great top view of businesses , strategy, scalability blah blah. Further you get to structure/strip/design fin products like loans, mezz, equity etc. But these largely require understanding of market pricing & regulations..only...
But thats kinda very different from having to decide on the logo, the brand name, the brand design, product notes, printers, web designs & so on... Most of these kind of things is what one has tackle first up. Its almost like chalk & cheese, I guess. The big dilemmas then are about whether the logo is good, whether you paid too much or too less for it & you dont have a frame of reference to figure these out.
What can I say..interesting.............for now..........
One of the dangers of having worked in a pure corporate fin services background is that you "actually do" very less. Time is spent largely on analysis (less) and presenting it in various formats (more). You do get a great top view of businesses , strategy, scalability blah blah. Further you get to structure/strip/design fin products like loans, mezz, equity etc. But these largely require understanding of market pricing & regulations..only...
But thats kinda very different from having to decide on the logo, the brand name, the brand design, product notes, printers, web designs & so on... Most of these kind of things is what one has tackle first up. Its almost like chalk & cheese, I guess. The big dilemmas then are about whether the logo is good, whether you paid too much or too less for it & you dont have a frame of reference to figure these out.
What can I say..interesting.............for now..........
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)